{"id":7146,"date":"2014-04-04T11:57:03","date_gmt":"2014-04-04T18:57:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogschapman.wpenginepowered.com\/law\/2014\/04\/04\/chapman-dialogue-paradoxical-preferences-on-social-spending-and-taxes-implications-for-regulatory-design\/"},"modified":"2014-04-04T11:57:03","modified_gmt":"2014-04-04T18:57:03","slug":"chapman-dialogue-paradoxical-preferences-on-social-spending-and-taxes-implications-for-regulatory-design","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/2014\/04\/04\/chapman-dialogue-paradoxical-preferences-on-social-spending-and-taxes-implications-for-regulatory-design\/","title":{"rendered":"Chapman Dialogue: Paradoxical Preferences on Social Spending and Taxes: Implications for Regulatory Design"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"panel-small-2\"
\nThe
\nChapman Dialogue held on Thursday, April 3, 2014<\/a>
\n at the Chapman University Dale E. Fowler School of Law featured Gillian Lester, acting dean of University of California Berkeley Law. The dialogue focused on “Paradoxical Preferences on Social Spending and Taxes: Implications for Regulatory Design.”
\n
\nDean Lester described the self-contradictory view held by some members of the American public on social spending and taxes. Her reasons for why this problem exists included the sheer complexity of some taxes and tax programs, how the difference in the collection of information can change an opinion and the symbolic association towards taxes.
\n
\nDean Lester’s principal research areas include contracts, employment law and policy. Her career began with a concentrated interest in employment contracts. However, as she progressed she gained a broad interest in the additional areas of employment law. The ideas behind her scholarship include how individual choices affect government regulations and does the law construct our attitudes of work preferences?
\n
\n

\"talk\"

\n Moderator – Bobby Dexter, Professor of Law Chapman University Dale E. Fowler School of Law; Dean Gillian Lester of University of California Berkeley Law<\/figcaption><\/figure>
\n
\nGillian Lester is the acting dean of Berkeley Law as well as the Alexander F. and May T. Morrison Professor of Law and Werner and Mimi Wolfen Research Professor. She has been a faculty member of Berkley Law since 2006. She holds her JSD from Stanford Law School and her LL.B. from the University of Toronto Faculty of Law, where she served as Editor-in-Chief of the
\nUniversity of Toronto Faculty of Law Review<\/em>
\n.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Chapman Dialogue held on Thursday, April 3, 2014 at the Chapman University Dale E. Fowler School of Law featured […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":543,"featured_media":8186,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"custom_author_name":"Fowler School of Law","chapman_pin_hero_slider":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[84],"class_list":["post-7146","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general-news","tag-chapman-dialogues"],"yoast_head":"\nFowler School of Law | Chapman Blogs<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/2014\/04\/04\/chapman-dialogue-paradoxical-preferences-on-social-spending-and-taxes-implications-for-regulatory-design\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Chapman Dialogue: Paradoxical Preferences on Social Spending and Taxes: Implications for Regulatory Design - Fowler School of Law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Chapman Dialogue held on Thursday, April 3, 2014 at the Chapman University Dale E. Fowler School of Law featured […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/2014\/04\/04\/chapman-dialogue-paradoxical-preferences-on-social-spending-and-taxes-implications-for-regulatory-design\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Fowler School of Law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-04-04T18:57:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2014\/04\/DSC_0006-scaled.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1707\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Fowler School of Law\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Fowler School of Law\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.chapman.edu\\\/law\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/04\\\/chapman-dialogue-paradoxical-preferences-on-social-spending-and-taxes-implications-for-regulatory-design\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.chapman.edu\\\/law\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/04\\\/chapman-dialogue-paradoxical-preferences-on-social-spending-and-taxes-implications-for-regulatory-design\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Fowler School of Law\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.chapman.edu\\\/law\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0b192f5f8476f821d9c266c53fcf04cd\"},\"headline\":\"Chapman Dialogue: Paradoxical Preferences on Social Spending and Taxes: Implications for Regulatory Design\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-04-04T18:57:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.chapman.edu\\\/law\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/04\\\/chapman-dialogue-paradoxical-preferences-on-social-spending-and-taxes-implications-for-regulatory-design\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":287,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.chapman.edu\\\/law\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.chapman.edu\\\/law\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/04\\\/chapman-dialogue-paradoxical-preferences-on-social-spending-and-taxes-implications-for-regulatory-design\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.chapman.edu\\\/law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/71\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/DSC_0006-scaled.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Chapman Dialogues\"],\"articleSection\":[\"General News\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.chapman.edu\\\/law\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/04\\\/chapman-dialogue-paradoxical-preferences-on-social-spending-and-taxes-implications-for-regulatory-design\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.chapman.edu\\\/law\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/04\\\/chapman-dialogue-paradoxical-preferences-on-social-spending-and-taxes-implications-for-regulatory-design\\\/\",\"name\":\"Chapman Dialogue: Paradoxical Preferences on Social Spending and Taxes: Implications for Regulatory Design - Fowler School of Law\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.chapman.edu\\\/law\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.chapman.edu\\\/law\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/04\\\/chapman-dialogue-paradoxical-preferences-on-social-spending-and-taxes-implications-for-regulatory-design\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.chapman.edu\\\/law\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/04\\\/chapman-dialogue-paradoxical-preferences-on-social-spending-and-taxes-implications-for-regulatory-design\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.chapman.edu\\\/law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/71\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/DSC_0006-scaled.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-04-04T18:57:03+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.chapman.edu\\\/law\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/04\\\/chapman-dialogue-paradoxical-preferences-on-social-spending-and-taxes-implications-for-regulatory-design\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.chapman.edu\\\/law\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/04\\\/chapman-dialogue-paradoxical-preferences-on-social-spending-and-taxes-implications-for-regulatory-design\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.chapman.edu\\\/law\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/04\\\/chapman-dialogue-paradoxical-preferences-on-social-spending-and-taxes-implications-for-regulatory-design\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.chapman.edu\\\/law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/71\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/DSC_0006-scaled.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.chapman.edu\\\/law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/71\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/DSC_0006-scaled.jpg\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":1707},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.chapman.edu\\\/law\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/04\\\/chapman-dialogue-paradoxical-preferences-on-social-spending-and-taxes-implications-for-regulatory-design\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.chapman.edu\\\/law\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Chapman Dialogue: Paradoxical Preferences on Social Spending and Taxes: Implications for Regulatory Design\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.chapman.edu\\\/law\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.chapman.edu\\\/law\\\/\",\"name\":\"Fowler School of Law\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.chapman.edu\\\/law\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.chapman.edu\\\/law\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.chapman.edu\\\/law\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Fowler School of Law\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.chapman.edu\\\/law\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.chapman.edu\\\/law\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.chapman.edu\\\/law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/71\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/MasterBrand_000-scaled-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.chapman.edu\\\/law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/71\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/MasterBrand_000-scaled-1.png\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":435,\"caption\":\"Fowler School of Law\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.chapman.edu\\\/law\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.chapman.edu\\\/law\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0b192f5f8476f821d9c266c53fcf04cd\",\"name\":\"Fowler School of Law\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/5518558bd8323e4150e190383ecd953f2fdb7475f6d30a7a2c0d9077bc70a442?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/5518558bd8323e4150e190383ecd953f2fdb7475f6d30a7a2c0d9077bc70a442?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/5518558bd8323e4150e190383ecd953f2fdb7475f6d30a7a2c0d9077bc70a442?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Fowler School of Law\"},\"url\":\"\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Fowler School of Law | Chapman Blogs","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/2014\/04\/04\/chapman-dialogue-paradoxical-preferences-on-social-spending-and-taxes-implications-for-regulatory-design\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Chapman Dialogue: Paradoxical Preferences on Social Spending and Taxes: Implications for Regulatory Design - Fowler School of Law","og_description":"The Chapman Dialogue held on Thursday, April 3, 2014 at the Chapman University Dale E. Fowler School of Law featured […]","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/2014\/04\/04\/chapman-dialogue-paradoxical-preferences-on-social-spending-and-taxes-implications-for-regulatory-design\/","og_site_name":"Fowler School of Law","article_published_time":"2014-04-04T18:57:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":1707,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2014\/04\/DSC_0006-scaled.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Fowler School of Law","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Fowler School of Law","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/2014\/04\/04\/chapman-dialogue-paradoxical-preferences-on-social-spending-and-taxes-implications-for-regulatory-design\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/2014\/04\/04\/chapman-dialogue-paradoxical-preferences-on-social-spending-and-taxes-implications-for-regulatory-design\/"},"author":{"name":"Fowler School of Law","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/#\/schema\/person\/0b192f5f8476f821d9c266c53fcf04cd"},"headline":"Chapman Dialogue: Paradoxical Preferences on Social Spending and Taxes: Implications for Regulatory Design","datePublished":"2014-04-04T18:57:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/2014\/04\/04\/chapman-dialogue-paradoxical-preferences-on-social-spending-and-taxes-implications-for-regulatory-design\/"},"wordCount":287,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/2014\/04\/04\/chapman-dialogue-paradoxical-preferences-on-social-spending-and-taxes-implications-for-regulatory-design\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2014\/04\/DSC_0006-scaled.jpg","keywords":["Chapman Dialogues"],"articleSection":["General News"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/2014\/04\/04\/chapman-dialogue-paradoxical-preferences-on-social-spending-and-taxes-implications-for-regulatory-design\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/2014\/04\/04\/chapman-dialogue-paradoxical-preferences-on-social-spending-and-taxes-implications-for-regulatory-design\/","name":"Chapman Dialogue: Paradoxical Preferences on Social Spending and Taxes: Implications for Regulatory Design - Fowler School of Law","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/2014\/04\/04\/chapman-dialogue-paradoxical-preferences-on-social-spending-and-taxes-implications-for-regulatory-design\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/2014\/04\/04\/chapman-dialogue-paradoxical-preferences-on-social-spending-and-taxes-implications-for-regulatory-design\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2014\/04\/DSC_0006-scaled.jpg","datePublished":"2014-04-04T18:57:03+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/2014\/04\/04\/chapman-dialogue-paradoxical-preferences-on-social-spending-and-taxes-implications-for-regulatory-design\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/2014\/04\/04\/chapman-dialogue-paradoxical-preferences-on-social-spending-and-taxes-implications-for-regulatory-design\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/2014\/04\/04\/chapman-dialogue-paradoxical-preferences-on-social-spending-and-taxes-implications-for-regulatory-design\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2014\/04\/DSC_0006-scaled.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2014\/04\/DSC_0006-scaled.jpg","width":2560,"height":1707},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/2014\/04\/04\/chapman-dialogue-paradoxical-preferences-on-social-spending-and-taxes-implications-for-regulatory-design\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Chapman Dialogue: Paradoxical Preferences on Social Spending and Taxes: Implications for Regulatory Design"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/","name":"Fowler School of Law","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/#organization","name":"Fowler School of Law","url":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2026\/03\/MasterBrand_000-scaled-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2026\/03\/MasterBrand_000-scaled-1.png","width":2560,"height":435,"caption":"Fowler School of Law"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/#\/schema\/person\/0b192f5f8476f821d9c266c53fcf04cd","name":"Fowler School of Law","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5518558bd8323e4150e190383ecd953f2fdb7475f6d30a7a2c0d9077bc70a442?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5518558bd8323e4150e190383ecd953f2fdb7475f6d30a7a2c0d9077bc70a442?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5518558bd8323e4150e190383ecd953f2fdb7475f6d30a7a2c0d9077bc70a442?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Fowler School of Law"},"url":""}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7146","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/543"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7146"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7146\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8186"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7146"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7146"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.chapman.edu\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7146"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}